<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U-verse vs Cable TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fiberforall.org/uverse-vs-cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fiberforall.org/uverse-vs-cable/</link>
	<description>Because everyone should have the speed and freedom of fiber optics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://fiberforall.org/uverse-vs-cable/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 08:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiberforall.org/?p=38#comment-669</guid>
		<description>The down side of U-Verse is after about 3am all the channels go to scamy &quot;paid programming.&quot; When I say scamy, I mean you go look it up on google, and add +scam to see how bad they screwed all their customers. At least when I had cable, I had omg I can&#039;t sleep late late night television. Anyone remember &quot;Army of Darkness?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The down side of U-Verse is after about 3am all the channels go to scamy &#8220;paid programming.&#8221; When I say scamy, I mean you go look it up on google, and add +scam to see how bad they screwed all their customers. At least when I had cable, I had omg I can&#8217;t sleep late late night television. Anyone remember &#8220;Army of Darkness?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay R Cap</title>
		<link>http://fiberforall.org/uverse-vs-cable/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay R Cap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiberforall.org/?p=38#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Ok, 1st of all you are rambling on about wireless, which has nothing to do with fiber optics or land line services! Horray for your beliefs in Verizon Wireless, must be fun downloading things slowly. The word &quot;COX&quot; cable speaks for itself... Lets see; new technology, dedicated service, software based, fiber optic TV...... or...... souped up 80s technology that has hit the ceiling for expansion and is an inferior piece of junk...... Hey buddy, guess what? at&amp;t does not carry 4G!!!! But lets say they did, because i happen to have an i-phone and the 4G EVO from sprint, funny how 4G can carry 21 MGPS wirelessly!! hmmmmmm that sounds faster then your junked out cable. HEY and while we are at it, go pull up the reports from JD Power and Consumer Reports. So if your statments are true then why is U-verse a milestone above your  chinsy little &quot;cox&quot; cable. In all reality the services that you have just blows &quot;cox&quot;. At&amp;ts net worth 168 billion, #3 on Forbes list. Cox cable, NOT ON THE FORBES LIST, come on even George Bush probably has a net worth higher then Cox cable. U-verse wins!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, 1st of all you are rambling on about wireless, which has nothing to do with fiber optics or land line services! Horray for your beliefs in Verizon Wireless, must be fun downloading things slowly. The word &#8220;COX&#8221; cable speaks for itself&#8230; Lets see; new technology, dedicated service, software based, fiber optic TV&#8230;&#8230; or&#8230;&#8230; souped up 80s technology that has hit the ceiling for expansion and is an inferior piece of junk&#8230;&#8230; Hey buddy, guess what? at&amp;t does not carry 4G!!!! But lets say they did, because i happen to have an i-phone and the 4G EVO from sprint, funny how 4G can carry 21 MGPS wirelessly!! hmmmmmm that sounds faster then your junked out cable. HEY and while we are at it, go pull up the reports from JD Power and Consumer Reports. So if your statments are true then why is U-verse a milestone above your  chinsy little &#8220;cox&#8221; cable. In all reality the services that you have just blows &#8220;cox&#8221;. At&amp;ts net worth 168 billion, #3 on Forbes list. Cox cable, NOT ON THE FORBES LIST, come on even George Bush probably has a net worth higher then Cox cable. U-verse wins!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Woodard</title>
		<link>http://fiberforall.org/uverse-vs-cable/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Woodard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiberforall.org/?p=38#comment-626</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll believe it when I see it!  I&#039;m not one of those who falls for everything that comes down the pike.  Take, for instance the wireless debate over who&#039;s better;  AT&amp;T or Verizon.  I have been with Verizon for 16 years when it was Cellular One!   Since that time it has undergone numerous changes to make itself bigger and much better.  AT&amp;T has continued to play catch up offering such technology as 4G smartphones.   Such technology has no value to the consumer yet unless you want to buy the latest bells and whistles.  Verizon, on the other hand is continuing to improve on it&#039;s 3G product while waiting to get the bugs out of the 4G line THEN offering it to the consumer.  Verizon has the best quality over AT&amp;T wirelss bar none.  Personally,  I have NEVER had a dropped call.  NEVER!  That is far and away better than my partners who subscribe to AT&amp;T wirelss.  They constantly moan about dropped calls in the city where we live.  NOT ME!  My signal is always there and crystal clear.  Even in the grocery store where I shop.  NO DROPPED CALLS.  I will stick with Cox cable and Verizon until something better comes.  Right now....AT&amp;T ain&#039;t it for me!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll believe it when I see it!  I&#8217;m not one of those who falls for everything that comes down the pike.  Take, for instance the wireless debate over who&#8217;s better;  AT&amp;T or Verizon.  I have been with Verizon for 16 years when it was Cellular One!   Since that time it has undergone numerous changes to make itself bigger and much better.  AT&amp;T has continued to play catch up offering such technology as 4G smartphones.   Such technology has no value to the consumer yet unless you want to buy the latest bells and whistles.  Verizon, on the other hand is continuing to improve on it&#8217;s 3G product while waiting to get the bugs out of the 4G line THEN offering it to the consumer.  Verizon has the best quality over AT&amp;T wirelss bar none.  Personally,  I have NEVER had a dropped call.  NEVER!  That is far and away better than my partners who subscribe to AT&amp;T wirelss.  They constantly moan about dropped calls in the city where we live.  NOT ME!  My signal is always there and crystal clear.  Even in the grocery store where I shop.  NO DROPPED CALLS.  I will stick with Cox cable and Verizon until something better comes.  Right now&#8230;.AT&amp;T ain&#8217;t it for me!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

