Comments on: How is AT&T UVerse different from Verizon FiOS? http://fiberforall.org/att-uverse-vs-verizon-fios/ Because everyone should have the speed and freedom of fiber optics Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:32:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: pizzaiolo http://fiberforall.org/att-uverse-vs-verizon-fios/#comment-617 pizzaiolo Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:32:47 +0000 http://fiberforall.org/?p=33#comment-617 Read again, when you talk about "the question is not what is the best today, but what is best for the future". The article's author had it right that AT&T is delivering to a rapidly broadening and satisfied customer base with FTTN, and they can retroactively improve by deploying FTTP later. That strategy makes a lot of sense, and delivers a competitive advantage in my area over Time Warner Cable. While I've been waiting for years to hear when FIOS will appear in my area, I was surprised to learn recently that U-verse is already here! I'll be dropping TWC like a hot potato at the end of this month. And comments like "Fios offers more that att i prefer fios" add zero value to the discussion. Read again, when you talk about “the question is not what is the best today, but what is best for the future”. The article’s author had it right that AT&T is delivering to a rapidly broadening and satisfied customer base with FTTN, and they can retroactively improve by deploying FTTP later. That strategy makes a lot of sense, and delivers a competitive advantage in my area over Time Warner Cable. While I’ve been waiting for years to hear when FIOS will appear in my area, I was surprised to learn recently that U-verse is already here! I’ll be dropping TWC like a hot potato at the end of this month.

And comments like “Fios offers more that att i prefer fios” add zero value to the discussion.

]]> By: Fios http://fiberforall.org/att-uverse-vs-verizon-fios/#comment-584 Fios Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:55:38 +0000 http://fiberforall.org/?p=33#comment-584 Fios offers more that att i prefer fios Fios offers more that att i prefer fios

]]> By: F Young http://fiberforall.org/att-uverse-vs-verizon-fios/#comment-510 F Young Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:21:18 +0000 http://fiberforall.org/?p=33#comment-510 In think the question is not what is the best today, but what is best for the future. I would have say FiOS simply because of the limited braodband capibilities of U-verse. Let's face it, dial-up was great back when the interent was simple, however is not even feasable for the average internet customer today download videos and other broadband media. FTTP (fiber-to-the-premises) provides an unlimited bandwidth capibilities which can not be delivered over the 'last mile' of copper. Google has just announced an experiment to provide a competitively priced broadband 100 times what can be obtained by the average comsumer today. They're plan is to go over FTTP and would exceed U-verse's max bandwidth over copper. In think the question is not what is the best today, but what is best for the future.
I would have say FiOS simply because of the limited braodband capibilities of U-verse. Let’s face it, dial-up was great back when the interent was simple, however is not even feasable for the average internet customer today download videos and other broadband media. FTTP (fiber-to-the-premises) provides an unlimited bandwidth capibilities which can not be delivered over the ‘last mile’ of copper.
Google has just announced an experiment to provide a competitively priced broadband 100 times what can be obtained by the average comsumer today. They’re plan is to go over FTTP and would exceed U-verse’s max bandwidth over copper.

]]> By: Go for U-verse http://fiberforall.org/att-uverse-vs-verizon-fios/#comment-166 Go for U-verse Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:39:50 +0000 http://fiberforall.org/?p=33#comment-166 I go for U-verse primarily because there's no contract required, it allows me to test the service first,..which no doubt about, I'm really impressed with the quality of image I'm receiving ... plus the several apps they have... I go for U-verse primarily because there’s no contract required, it allows me to test the service first,..which no doubt about, I’m really impressed with the quality of image I’m receiving … plus the several apps they have…

]]>